Progress

It has been an important week for those who try to inform parents about the dangers of Steiner education.

Thanks to the British Humanist Association (BHA), the Department for Education (DfE) released the documents parents and the public at large badly needed to see. Many serious problems with Steiner schools had been made known to the Department before the decision was made to fund them as free schools. (See previous post)

The result was a segment on Newsnight and the sharing of the facts about anthroposophy to an even wider audience. A short film was followed by a studio debate where Robert Peston showed an understanding of the issues.

Yesterday Chris Cook a Policy Editor for the BBC wrote a blogpost demonstrating that he also “gets it”.

The story was also reported in the Times Educational Supplement and is on the BHA website.

In addition a report in the Guardian last week highlighted the difficulties within the Camphill movement, where large amounts of public money have been spent on what is described as a “social experiment” using anthroposophy to provide care for vulnerable adults.

Whatever parents think about Rudolf Steiner’s claims to be clairvoyant, and the resulting belief system “anthroposophy”, perhaps they will now be more aware of the kind of education they are selecting for their child when they are attracted to a Steiner school.

As comments here and accounts on many other websites have shown, so many families have been misled, taken in by the “hype”, and children and families have been suffering as a result. It is those innocent about anthroposophy who are most likely to leave in distress.

Looking back over the last few weeks, with the departure of Michael Gove from his role as Education Secretary, the failure of the Steiner free school bid here in Stroud, and the withdrawal of another bid in Leeds, it is tempting to believe that investigation into this important “story” has already had some effect.

Michael Gove approved Steiner schools for state-funding despite the facts about their unsuitablility having been made perfectly clear to his department. We do not yet know the exact reason for this, but the circumstances of his visit to a Steiner school in Bruton, Somerset, accompanied by members of the Rees Mogg family are considered significant by the BHA in their assessment of the whole sorry story, in a section entitled “How Michael Gove and the DfE’s Free Schools team came to support Steiner schools” .

The BHA briefing from January this year also describes the problems with pseudoscience on the curriculum, anti-vaccination, problematic racial theories in anthoposophy used in the classroom, karma and bullying, and the science curriculum itself, to list a few.

Further Steiner schools being approved as free schools now seems unlikely, and with parents better informed about the way teachers are trained in anthroposophy, it is difficult to see the existing schools maintaining popularity among new recruits.

Once they are easily available to those who need them, the facts speak for themselves. Until now it has been difficult for anyone to even realise anthroposophy exists before signing up to Steiner, let alone researching the subject and its potentially damaging effects on families.

As MarkH says, this week’s events may be seen as a “Watershed moment”, and the point at which it finally became clear that the Steiner movement is not fit to run schools or provide care, and one with which it is not wise to become associated.

 

 

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Steve

    I’m sorry Helen but you’re slightly mistaken. You said “The BHA briefing from January this year also describes the problems with pseudoscience on the curriculum, anti-vaccination, problematic racial theories in anthoposophy used in the classroom, karma and bullying, and the science curriculum itself, to list a few.”

    The one thing is that entire list which they did not mention in the briefing was bullying. In fact until the Newsnight interview they weren’t interested in that particular concern at all, as they had told us themselves. Of course, now the BHA say that they’ve been concerned about it all long, but the facts regretfully don’t lie.

    But yes, it’s great news that people was waking up to what’s going on in Steiner schools.

  2. Helen

    A question Chris Cook asks in his blogpost;
    “Perhaps the DfE ought to consider asking for clarification on what parts of Steiner’s works are in and what parts are out.”
    Excellent idea! I have asked several Steiner people, (teachers, patients) if there are any bits of Steiner they reject. Invariably the answer is “no”.

  3. we escaped!

    Im sure they will start rejecting bits now. It will all be about damage control and they will say anything to get themselves out of this.
    This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what has been exposed so far – and they know it.

Any thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s