Local Authorities pay for eurythmy

According to Steiner ideas about medical matters there are specific therapies to treat spiritual deficiencies. These are listed on the Ruskin Mill college website student support page, and include the following;

When I spoke to someone at Gloucestershire County Council about the use of anthroposophical medicine at this local local Steiner college where they fund places, I was told that Ruskin Mill was only used as a “last resort”, and that the council had certainly not been funding any of the anthroposophical  therapies I asked about.

However a phone call to Ruskin Mill confirmed that the therapies were paid for by local authorities, as part of a package. For example a student could be receiving one or two hours a week of one-to -one eurythmy therapy, weekly massage therapy, and the attention of an on-site anthroposophical nurse.

And yet according to the person I spoke to at the council, none of these therapies are itemised in any correspondence between the college and the council, and she could not imagine that any of them would be sanctioned for use on students they fund places for.

I made three freedom of information requests in November last year and the answers confirm that therapies at the college do appear to be funded by tax-payers;

I made requests about placements for young people at Ruskin Mill college in the Stroud area to three authorities; Gloucestershire, South Gloucestershire, and Swindon Borough Council.

Swindon Borough have funded 10 students since 2010 and say 

There are no details outlined in any funding application forms or in the
 subsequent Funding Requirement submitted by Ruskin Mill other than a
heading Therapy Costs in which Physiotherapy, Behavioural Support, Speech
and Language and Counselling are given a monetary figure

Gloucestershire County Council say they have funded 13 places at Ruskin Mill, and answer the rest of my questions in one paragraph;

We purchase an overall package from Ruskin Mill Cottage  taking into account the 
range of facilities which they offer including therapies. As with any other school or 
college, we would expect Ruskin Mill Cottage  to meet the needs of the individual 
student with whatever individual support they require including therapies. We would
expect this provision to be reviewed regularly within the college’s contractual 
arrangements with GCC.

South Gloucestershire Council is also funding 12 students at Ruskin Mill, and says

“Students access the “conventional” carousel of therapies Ruskin Mill use…”

SGC also say that the college has not asked the council to sanction or fund the specific anthroposophic therapies I asked about, and that

“There is currently no process in place to identify whether nor not these therapies are being used on students”.

I don’t know whether the local authority services are joined up enough for answers such as these to FOI requests to trigger any kind of investigation within the Youth support teams.

For public money to be spent on subjecting some of our most vulnerable young people to alternative therapies with no proven benefit seems very wrong to me. I do not even understand how this can be legal.

It does, however, explain how the large number of Steiner specialists in this area make a living; the therapies are prescribed by the anthroposophical doctor, supplied by the therapists, and paid for indirectly by you and me, via the county councils who do not appear to be interested enough to look in to exactly what they are paying for.

There are “panels” at Gloucestershire County Council where health and educational professionals meet to discuss the needs of the young people they support, and they either approve these therapies (which seems unlikely given the response I had on the phone) or they are not being informed in detail by Ruskin Mill about what is going on, to arouse suspicions.


Anthroposophic doctors and nurses belief that illness, indeed all forms of suffering, are a result of “karma”, and must be worked through in the appropriate way according to Rudolf Steiner’s proclamations. Hence the disapproval of vaccination within Steiner circles; these illnesses have a cause and a purpose, according to this belief system.




  1. Anna

    Once again, you seem to be the only
    organisation asking any questions. And with such inadequate replies from the various councils, it looks as if they haven’t really investigated what they are allocating tax payers’ money to. Very worrying indeed.

    As a teacher in mainstream schools, I have to have an up to date “Disclosure and Barring Service” certificate, for every educational establishment I work at. This is a very important child protection measure. Given some of the reports on how some children have been treated, as a result of their ‘karma’, it does make me wonder whether these so called ‘therapeutic’ practitioners treating children and young adults, are also checked in the same way by the DBS, and whether proper investigations are carried out into the efficacy of these ‘therapies’.

    It’s always good to ask questions – it’s the basis of knowledge. More of us need to insist on thorough research into these anthroposophical establishments, particularly those in the Stroud area.

  2. Nick

    The issue is that there are medically qualified doctors who advocate these therapies. Social care providers should have policies to cover this and generally require medical practitioner advice if the person does not have capacity to consent. This whole system breaks down when you have GP s who believe this rubbish.

Any thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s